![]() ![]() ![]() – BigBen Interactive GmbH and BigBen Interactive SA, by W. Götz, C. Onken and C. Kurtz, Rechtsanwälte, Ltd, by A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, Rechtsanwälte, Having regard to the written procedure and further to the hearing on 7 December 2016,Īfter considering the observations submitted on behalf of: ![]() REQUESTS for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Higher Regional Court, Düsseldorf, Germany), made by decisions of 7 January 2016, received at the Court on 18 January 2016, in the proceedingsĬomposed of M. Ilešič (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, K. Lenaerts, President of the Court of Justice, acting as Judge of the Second Chamber, A. Prechal, C. Toader and E. Jarašiūnas, Judges, * Language of the case: German s for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property - Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Article 20(1)(c), Article 79(1) and Articles 82, 83, 88 and 89 - Action for infringement - Limitation of the rights conferred by the Community design - Concept of ‘citations’ - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Article 6(1) - Jurisdiction in respect of the co-defendant domiciled outside the Member State of the forum - Territorial scope of the jurisdiction of the Community design courts - Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 - Article 8(2) - Law applicable to claims seeking the adoption of orders relating to sanctions and other measures) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |